Enduring romantic, emotional or sexual attraction toward a particular object, structure or other inanimate entity.
Back to the glossaryBody & object focus
Objectophilia
Also known as object sexuality
A pattern of strong romantic, emotional or sexual attraction directed towards particular inanimate objects. It is distinct from simply enjoying an object as a prop, material or collectible.
Body & object focus
In brief
A specific bond, not a synonym for every object fetish.
Objectophilia, also called object sexuality, describes strong romantic, emotional or sexual attraction directed toward particular inanimate objects. Some people describe a relationship-like bond with one specific structure, machine, instrument or conceptual object; this differs from simply using a prop, collecting a category or liking a material. Accounts are diverse, and current research is too small to establish a single cause or clinical profile.
Erotic focus on an object category, garment or material; relationship-like attachment is not required.
A consenting adult temporarily performs an object-like role while retaining full autonomy.
Acquiring and caring for objects for interest, history or aesthetics with no necessary romantic or erotic bond.
What the literature can—and cannot—say
Published objectophilia literature is very small and includes conceptual analysis more often than representative empirical research. Gatzia and Arnaud examine several possible explanatory hypotheses, but their paper cannot prove that autism, synaesthesia, imagery or fetishism causes objectophilia.
Media accounts and self-selected communities can make lived experience visible while still being unsuitable for prevalence estimates. A claimed relationship with an object should not be used to infer diagnosis, capacity, loneliness or inability to relate to people.
Objects, features and attachment
Objects described in public accounts range from buildings, bridges and vehicles to instruments, machines, words or abstract systems. Form, sound, history, perceived personality, reliability and personal memory may matter as much as material or touch.
A museum-style still life or abstract component can illustrate focused attention without presenting a real person's valued object as a curiosity. See Vehicle and machinery fetish, Statue and mannequin interest and Technosexual interest for narrower overlaps.
Property, public space and safety
An emotional bond does not create ownership or unrestricted access. Buildings, vehicles, monuments and machines belong to people or institutions, and touching, climbing, entering, modifying or photographing them can involve property rules, privacy and serious physical hazards.
Machinery, traffic, electricity, heat, heights and restricted sites remain dangerous regardless of meaning. Fantasy, writing, photography from permitted places or a personally owned harmless object can express interest without unsafe interaction.
Respect and clinical distinction
Objectophilia is not automatically a paraphilic disorder. WHO guidance centres marked distress, significant impairment, serious risk or non-consent, and a clinician would need to understand the person's experience rather than diagnose from an unusual attachment alone.
Distress caused mainly by ridicule or exclusion should not be confused automatically with distress inherent to the attraction. Equally, an objectophilia label does not excuse trespass, damage, danger or disregard for other people's rights.
Non-graphic examples
What the umbrella may include
- Feeling a relationship-like attachment to a particular personally owned instrument.
- Being drawn to the history and perceived character of one bridge while respecting access rules.
- Liking machines as a category without describing any specific object as a partner.
- Using an abstract component in an illustration rather than exposing a private valued object.
- Keeping admiration at a safe distance from traffic, machinery or restricted infrastructure.
Reviewed 30 August 2026
Keep exploring.
This detailed field note uses the best available evidence without treating one community sample as universal. Evidence limits and UK context are stated where relevant.
Prepared by The UK Kink Guide editorial team. Read the evidence and review methodology.
Found an error or important omission? See how to report a correction.
Explore all 268 entries