An umbrella for relationship structures in which adults knowingly agree that more than one sexual and/or romantic connection may occur.
Sources and evidence type
Manual claim and limitation notes are shown where an individual source audit is complete. Other evidence-type labels are a publisher aid awaiting source-by-source confirmation.
Scoats & Campbell (2022), CNM research reviewResearch study
Source design
Peer-reviewed research or review
What it can support
The specific population, measures and findings reported by the paper.
Important limitation
It cannot automatically establish UK prevalence, causation, diagnosis, consent or an individual outcome. Check recruitment, definitions and study design.
The specific population, measures and findings reported by the paper.
Important limitation
It cannot automatically establish UK prevalence, causation, diagnosis, consent or an individual outcome. Check recruitment, definitions and study design.
The specific population, measures and findings reported by the paper.
Important limitation
It cannot automatically establish UK prevalence, causation, diagnosis, consent or an individual outcome. Check recruitment, definitions and study design.
Illustration created using generative AI; not documentary evidence.
In brief
Multiple possible connections with informed agreement.
Consensual non-monogamy, or CNM, includes varied arrangements such as polyamory, open relationships and swinging. Its defining feature is informed agreement rather than the number of partners alone. It differs from concealed infidelity because relevant partners know the relationship is non-exclusive.
Consent is networked, not transferred
Each person consents to their own participation and agreements. One partner cannot consent on behalf of another person, and being in CNM does not mean being available to everyone.
Disclosure agreements should be clear about timing and privacy. Transparency between partners does not authorise sharing another person's intimate details without permission.
Status
Detailed editorial draft
Publisher
The UK Kink Guide
Reviewed
Structured draft present; individual review date not recorded
Evidence
3 cited sources · types labelled below
Jurisdiction
UK-focused general education
Read the rest: evidence, law, safety and sources
CNM
The broad umbrella for knowingly agreed non-exclusive sexual and/or romantic structures.
Polyamory
CNM commonly allowing multiple loving or emotionally intimate relationships.
Open relationship
A partnered arrangement permitting defined outside sexual or romantic connections.
Infidelity
A breach of an agreement; it can occur in monogamous and non-monogamous relationships.
Agreements and communication
Topics may include time, safer sex, disclosure, hosting, finances, public visibility and changing feelings. Agreements work best when they are understandable, realistic and open to review.
Rules imposed through fear or unequal leverage may not reflect genuine agreement. Ending or renegotiating remains available.
Evidence and stigma
Reviews generally find similar average psychological wellbeing and relationship quality in CNM and monogamous groups. A recent meta-analysis found no overall satisfaction advantage for either structure.
CNM people may face stigma in families, workplaces and healthcare. These pressures can affect wellbeing independently of relationship functioning.
Health and law
Partner number alone does not determine STI risk. Testing, barriers, vaccination, activities and communication provide more useful information.
UK relationship recognition, parental rights, housing and benefits may privilege couples or marriage. Personal legal questions require specialist advice.
Non-graphic examples
What the umbrella may include
Partners agree that additional romantic relationships may develop.
An open couple defines safer-sex and disclosure expectations.
Someone declines a new connection despite identifying as non-monogamous.
A privacy agreement limits what metamours are told.
Partners revisit an arrangement when time commitments change.
Prepare for an appointment
Questions you could ask a professional
What information would help you understand my question?
What are the realistic options and uncertainties?
How can disability, communication or privacy needs be accommodated?
When should the situation be reviewed again?
These prompts do not replace assessment and do not imply that every reader needs professional care.
Continue learning
Take the next step from definition to context.
Continue with independent guidance connecting consensual non-monogamy to evidence, consent, safety, uncertainty and practical decisions.